Skip to main content

THE BULLWHIP EFFECT


The bullwhip effect is one of the most well-known supply chain concepts. Proctor & Gamble (P&G) coined the term when studying the demand fluctuations for Pampers, their disposable diapers. Despite the fact that babies use diapers at a very predictable rate and therefore retail demand is flat, P&G observed that this product created a wave of changes up the supply chain due to very minor changes in demand.


Behavioural Causes

The first theories focusing onto the bullwhip effect were mainly focusing on the irrational behavior of the human in the supply chain, highlighting them as the main cause of the bullwhip effect. Since the 90’s, the studies evolved, placing the supply chain’s mis-functioning at the heart of their studies abandoning the human factors. Previous control-theoretic models have identified the following causes:-

1)      The trade-off between stationary and dynamic performance, as well as,

2)      The use of independent controllers

In accordance with the study conducted by Dellaert, Udenio and Vatamidou (2017), one of the main behavioural causes that contribute to the bullwhip effect is the under-estimation of the pipeline.  In addition, the complementary bias, (over-estimation of the pipeline), also has a negative effect under such conditions. Nevertheless, it has been shown that when the demand stream is stationary, the system is relatively robust to this bias. In such situations, it has been found that biased policies (both under-estimating and over-estimating the pipeline) perform just as well as unbiased policies. Some others behavioral causes can be:


Factors Leading To Bullwhip Effect

In 1997, studies on the bullwhip effect showed that this last was not solely a result of irrational decision making. More than that, this effect seems to find its source because of the rational behaviors of the players within the supply chain’s infrastructure. The factors may be as follows:

1)      Demand Forecasting Updating: Demand forecast updating refers to the situation where demand is non-stationary and one uses past demand information to update forecasts.

2)      Rationing Gaming: The rationing gaming refers to the strategic ordering behavior of buyers when supply shortage is anticipated.

3)      Order Batching: When fixed order cost is nonzero, ordering in every period would be uneconomical, and batching of orders would occur.

4)      Price Variations: Price variations refer to non-constant purchase prices of the product.

5)      Communication: Lack of communication between various actors in the supply chain can lead to bullwhip effect.

6)      Non Responsive Supply Chain

In addition to greater safety stocks, the described effect can lead to either inefficient production or excessive inventory, as each producer needs to fulfill the demand of its customers in the supply chain. This also leads to a low utilization of the distribution channel. In spite of having safety stocks there is still the hazard of stock-outs which result in poor customer service and lost sales. In addition to the (financially) hard measurable consequences of poor customer services and the damage to public image and loyalty, an organization has to cope with the ramifications of failed fulfillment which may include contractual penalties.

Moreover, repeated hiring and dismissal of employees to manage the demand variability induces further costs due to training and possible lay-offs. The impact of the bullwhip effect has been especially acute at the beginning stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, when sudden spikes in demand for everything from medical supplies such as masks or ventilators to consumer items such as toilet paper or eggs created feedback loops of panic buying, hoarding, and rationing.

Coping With The Bullwhip Effect


**Source Credits:

www.business2community.com

www.mbaskool.com



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RELEVANCE OF MYTHOLOGY: BEHAVIOURAL LESSONS FROM ICARUS/ JATAYU

  Tales from the Mythology & Us Sometimes, the mythology that resounds with us the most reveals much about where we are in life. How we interpret the ancient stories reveals more about our internal struggles than the motives of the authors who lived thousands of years ago. Mythology is a fascinating topic that has captivated people for centuries. It is the study of traditional stories, legends, and folklore that have been passed down from generation to generation. While many may believe that mythology is a relic of the past, it is still very relevant today. Firstly, mythology helps us understand our cultural heritage . Every culture has its own unique set of myths and legends that define its identity. These stories provide us with a glimpse into the beliefs, values, and customs of our ancestors. Secondly, mythology can help us understand ourselves . Many of the stories found in mythology are allegories that explore the human experience. They can provide us with insights into

CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE DEMYSTIFIED: EXPLORING ITS IMPORTANCE AND ESSENTIAL BEHAVIORS - CHAPTER 01

  IQ, EQ now CQ? As globalization has rendered the business environment more complex, dynamic, and competitive, the ability to function effectively in different cultural contexts, called Cultural Intelligence (CQ), has never been more important for institutions. Originally, the term cultural intelligence and the abbreviation “CQ” (Cultural Quotient) was developed by the research done by Soon Ang and Linn Van Dyne as a researched-based way of measuring and predicting intercultural performance.  The concept is related to that of cross-cultural competence but goes beyond that to look at intercultural capabilities as a form of intelligence that can be measured and developed . Cultural intelligence may be defined as “ a person’s capability to adapt as s/he interacts with others from different cultural regions ”, and has  behavioral, motivational,  and  metacognitive  aspects. Without cultural intelligence, we are susceptible to mirror imaging. The mirror effect can be observed in variou

AUTHENTICITY AT THE WORKPLACE: BEHAVIOURS ASSOCIATED AND DRAWBACKS

  Authenticity is surely the buzzword of the past year and much has been written recently about bringing our “whole” selves to work. But what does it look like in practice to “be real” in a professional setting?  And is it truly advisable? And if so, for whom? It sure has its positives . It does increase our overall well-being and happiness, creates psychological safety that strengthens relationships, leads to higher job satisfaction, and gives rise to undeniable improvements in productivity.    Firstly, authenticity can sometimes be seen as unprofessional . In many workplaces, there is an expectation of maintaining a certain level of decorum and professionalism. This can include things like dressing appropriately, using proper language, and behaving in a certain way. If someone prioritizes authenticity over professionalism, they may come across as unprofessional, which can be detrimental to their career. Secondly, authenticity can sometimes lead to oversharing . In an effort to be